Evangelical, born again, empowered evangelical or just plain old Christian?

Billy_graham Ask almost any Christian, at least in the United States, who they admire most in the Christian world, and you may likely hear:  Billy Graham.  With good reason, too.  Graham has been faithfully preaching the gospel for 60+ years.  Now in his mid-80s, he’s still preaching, having just completed a crusade in Kansas City a few weeks ago.  No accusations of being money hungry.  Nobody accusing him of sexual immorality.  The man truly is incredible.

Graham has been called the world’s most influential evangelical.  With Bush now back in the White House for four more years, we are told that we have returned a conservative evangelical to the White House.

How about you?  Would you consider yourself a conservative evangelical or just a regular old evangelical?  Billy Graham has said there are conservative evangelicals in both the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox churches.  I have friends who look at the war in Iraq and say, "Bush is no conservative evangelical."  Hmmm…

Well, okay, how about this view of an evangelical, as spoken by some of the Vineyard pastors I run with.  They refer to themselves as empowered evangelicals, taking their cue from Vineyard pastor Rich Nathan’s fine book "Empowered Evangelicals."Empowered_evangelicals_1

Back when I was in college President Jimmy Carter didn’t use the word evangelical.  He called himself a "born-again Christian."  Those engaged in evangelism, me included, went around asking people, "Are you born again?"

Chuck Colson, one of President Nixon’s aids, wrote a hugely popular book back in the 1970s about his  conversion called "Born Again."

But Billy Graham has stuck with the word evangelical.  In one interview Graham referred to an evangelical as someone who believes all the doctrines in the ancient Nicene Creed.  That’s fine.  I can certainly say the old Nicene Creed with a clear conscience, if I could find a copy.  Honestly, how many people these days know the Nicene Creed? 

Graham has stressed the centrality of the resurrection and the belief that salvation is through Jesus, alone.  "Ah ha," you say.  "Now I get it.  That’s what I believe, too.   That’s evangelical.  And furthermore, I believe that the Holy Spirit heals people today and all kinds of miracles are possible." 

Fine by me.  Does that then make you an "empowered evangelical"?  Pity the other evangelicals.  I guess they are unempowered.  I wonder if there are 12-step programs specifically designed for unempowered evangelicals?  "Hi, my name is Fred and I am an unempowered evangelical."

We in the Vineyard are doctrinally conservative, although even Vineyard folks argue about what are the doctrinally conservative issues.  For example, in some Vineyards women can preach and teach.  In others they can’t.  Believe me, there are wonderfully brilliant, empowered evangelicals on both sides of that issue.  (By the way, the Vineyard Statement of faith is outstanding in my opinion!) 

Essentially, we in the Vineyard emphasize the need for a definite commitment to faith in Christ.  Conversion is real and crucial.  We further affirm that faith is very important to our daily lives.  We believe Satan exists and that there is a battle raging between the kingdom of light and the kingdom of darkness.

In my ministry experience, I would say that most people use the terms born again and evangelical interchangeably. 

I don’t pretend for a second that navigating all the nuances of these terms is easy.  Meanings change as cultures shift and as time inexorably marches on. 

So how about this, brothers?  We are Christians — Christ followers.  Christ with the Latin ending … followers of. 

4 thoughts on “Evangelical, born again, empowered evangelical or just plain old Christian?

  1. Heh heh.Well, I'm not a big fan of terms. Defining Vineyardites as "Empowered Evangelicals" is just spin control, avoiding the nasty term "charismatic" and all that's associated with such movements.Frankly, the five terms I think are useful are conservative, liberal, evangelical, liturgical, and charismatic. But I think they are fairly useless for labelling people. Maybe I don't label people this way because I don't fit neatly into any of these five categories; I'm a blend of all five. Calling myself a Christian is dangerous enough. However, I think these terms are more helpful for labelling movements – Vineyard is generally conservative, evangelical, and charismatic.I much more frequently speak of these five things as ideas, and interact with them as such – conservatism, liberalism, evangelicalism, liturgy, and the charismatic.But I do agree with you about those poor unempowered evangelicals. How do they get by? πŸ™‚ Just kidding.

    Like

  2. We are in agreement that salvation is a free gift from God, received in faith by the sinner, creating belief and repentance. What I am asking you to consider is the PURPOSE of Christian baptism. Is the purpose of baptism really only as an act of obedience/public profession of faith? If so, why doesn't the Bible, in clear language, state as such? Why is the term "born again" used only three times in the KJV Bible but the word "baptism" or one of it's variants (to baptize) is used over 100 times in the NT? Why are there so many passages of Scripture that if read in their simple, plain, literal interpretation state that God forgives/washes away sins in baptism? Did God really have that much difficulty explaining the exact purpose of baptism? Did God allow every translator of the Bible into every language on earth to mistranslate Acts 2: 38 and other baptism passages? If baptism is simply the after-thought that most evangelicals make it out to be, why did Jesus, his disciples, the Apostles Paul and Peter make such a big deal about it? Is baptism really a work of man as Baptists and evangelicals claim…or is baptism a work of God? Lastly, there is no historical evidence found anywhere on planet earth, including areas never under the control of the Catholic Church or the Roman Empire, in which ANY Christian in the first approximately 800 years of Christianity believed that baptism is simply and only an act of OUR obedience/OUR public profession of faith. All evidence from this time period points to early Christians, from the very disciples of the Apostles such as Polycarp onward, believed that baptism means much, much more. I encourage you to ask the Holy Spirit to open your heart to the Truth of the Gospel and re-read the Bible without your denominational biases. God bless!Garyhttp://www.LutherWasNotBornAgain.com

    Like

Leave a reply to James Cancel reply